The problem I’m facing now in part three of the blog is how to simplify the idea, process, enough to create an image without extreme oversimplification. There is no way to pay sufficient tribute to all the ways humans suffer and all the solutions we’ve created to resolve them.
Mankind has grown in science and developed phenomenal knowledge in so many areas. We have learned so much and still know so little. Long presentations have been made, books written, about how modern medicine was birthed in a Civil War during a time where people of the same nation slaughtered each other over reasons that show our inner workings and corruptions. We are the best and worst in the same moments.
There are choices imbedded in all suffering. How do we respond? What do we do? What can we learn? Is there a God and what does He have to do with this? This is a sampling of questions when the list could go on and on. The last questions about God are the ones my blog pursues, and choice is a key component.
I spoke to a man in jail (Bob for convenience sake) who asked me how to accept that his condition was God’s plan. My response was that his condition wasn’t God’s plan; it was his. God was being put in the position of having to clean up the mess. I asked Bob if he would be in his current situation if he had loved God with his whole heart and his neighbor as himself. The obvious answer was “no.”
The Garden of Eden was not created for suffering, but our freedom to choose made suffering a real possibility. We can look through the history of the world and the history of our own lives and see a clear pattern regarding what choice has caused or cured or left unresolved. We are creatures who often create worse problems, like pollution, while we are solving other problems.
I do not want to negate or deny the process humanity uses to find and resolve issues related to suffering. I simply want to inject the often overlooked focus on asking God, inviting God, and following God into our lives. Had Bob answered my question with a “yes,” his life would have been better on all fronts, and the police would not have a reason to arrest him. A “yes” answer could stop wars and rewrite all our social, political ills. Consider what life would be like if all people on this planet could or would answer “yes.” It is the process that could be most effective, but often the road least traveled.